Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 39
- Last 30 days
- 0
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Sep 28, 2026.
Public comments (39)
Lives directly behind the church on Trenton Drive; asked the Commission to deny the variance, citing the lit 12-story-equivalent tower, loss of the gathering lawn, and removal of redwoods.
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 2:32:36 →A former city commissioner urged approval, praising temple grounds, donations to local nonprofits, and LEED Gold, solar, and EV-charging features.
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 2:35:03 →An R-1 neighbor said nearby residents oppose the variance, noting some LDS temples have no steeples at all and calling the steeple promotional rather than religiously required.
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 2:36:19 →A 13-year homeowner and former LDS member said the opposition is about land use, not religion; flew a drone to show the scale and submitted a petition signed by 41 adjacent neighbors.
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 2:38:05 →Lives directly behind the project on Trenton Drive; asked for enforceable noise standards, testing at the property line, and an 8-foot perimeter fence.
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 2:41:12 →Spoke in support, describing temple illumination as a tradition of sanctuaries as beacons of light and hope.
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 2:43:02 →A 20-year resident and LDS member said a temple near home would be a blessing allowing more frequent family worship.
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 2:43:59 →A 50-year resident who currently commutes over an hour to the Oakland Temple urged approval, noting staggered temple visits mean less traffic than current uses.
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 2:45:05 →Shared his conversion story at the Fremont Avenue building and hoped the temple would become a beacon for the community.
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 2:45:54 →The stake president said hundreds came in support, compared the design to Fremont High School, and explained the temple's outward appearance is part of worship.
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 2:47:29 →A 30-year District 1 resident urged approval, saying temple grounds and gardens will be open to the community.
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 2:50:01 →A Sunnyvale Community Services board member recalled the Washington DC temple as a beacon and said the Sunnyvale temple's soft lighting would have a similar effect.
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 2:51:03 →A 20-year Sunnyvale worker who drives past the site daily asked that the temple be approved as designed so his worship experience can be local.
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 2:51:57 →Hopes her children can someday be married in a temple so close to home.
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 2:53:30 →A 40-year Ticonderoga resident who is not a church member fully supports the project as an architectural improvement over the current building.
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 2:54:22 →A former church member asked for neighbor considerations on height and lighting to preserve the goodwill the church has built over generations; noted the Yorba Linda temple is 70 feet.
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 2:55:33 →A 50-year resident asked about FAA clearance for the steeple, warned the variance sets precedent, and raised bird-safety concerns about 5 a.m. lighting.
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 2:56:38 →A 42-year resident glad to see the eyesore improved but concerned about the height precedent given five or six nearby churches.
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 2:58:51 →Asked the Commission to deny the variance, arguing a flat 4.73-acre parcel shows no extraordinary circumstance and the golden-ratio justification is a design preference, not a constraint.
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 2:59:52 →Said the two-hour-plus round trip to Oakland limits her temple service; a local temple would let her serve more often.
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 3:02:00 →A 34-year resident and temple worker urged approval, emphasizing staggered traffic, the spire's low visual mass, and the church's compromises.
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 3:03:07 →An active member of the current building asked the Commission to approve the temple as designed, describing its quiet, community-building role.
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 3:05:36 →Lives about 100 yards north; recounted the neighborhood's one-story overlay petition and asked for computer renderings showing steeple sight lines from surrounding streets before approval.
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 3:07:04 →A 33-year resident with a clear view of the steeple asked for a no vote on the variance, saying she wants to sleep without an illuminated steeple at 5 a.m.
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 3:10:09 →Has a progressive muscle disease and said having a temple close to home would be a huge blessing for her and her family.
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 3:11:38 →Asked the Commission to reject the code exception so parties can reach a compatible solution, and urged independent review of environmental impacts and scrutiny of the CEQA exemption.
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 3:13:30 →A 22-year neighbor who has enjoyed the church as a great neighbor, but worried the steeple lighting will resemble the bright lights at the Sunrise community and Adventist church.
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 3:15:08 →A Homestead High senior said seeing the steeple from her house would be a daily reminder of her faith and asked the Commission to support the temple for local youth.
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 3:16:58 →The historical society president traced Fremont Avenue's history as a church corridor and said a temple keeps that theme.
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 3:18:13 →A 30-year resident urged approval, calling the temple a distinctive landmark and citing the church's community partnerships.
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 3:20:04 →A developer and LDS member who serves in the Oakland Temple praised the staff report's mitigation and said the large setbacks minimize impacts on adjacent residents.
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 3:21:46 →Bishop of the Woodland Park Ward; said the spire and lights are carefully crafted to invite people to connect with God.
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 3:24:00 →A 30-year resident who said temple worship strengthens families and makes better neighbors.
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 3:25:28 →A 42-year resident who added his support for the temple as proposed.
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 3:26:50 →Spoke briefly in support of the temple.
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 3:27:20 →A Silicon Valley CEO who walked the neighborhood and found AAPI residents supportive; praised chrysanthemum design elements and predicted the temple will be a cherished landmark.
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 3:28:00 →An Oakland temple attendee of 30 years who praised the applicant's diligence with staff and urged approval.
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 3:29:36 →Lives at the church's driveway on W. Fremont; asked for a local transportation analysis given patron volumes and a post-construction light-level check at the property line with applicant-funded fixes.
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 3:31:53 →Raised Brown Act concerns about late-distributed documents and argued the variance justification is circular — if the upward lighting is negotiable, why authorize the nighttime impact at all?
Planning Commission — September 28, 2026 · 3:33:54 →