Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Charter amendments and council pay polling→At a glance
- Public comments
- 7
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jun 16, 2026.
Public comments (9)
Suggested the council appointment charter amendment should include term-limit protections against appointee incumbency advantage, or he'll vote no.
City Council — June 16, 2026 · 7:55:09 →Argued the ballot questions aren't fully truthful — they don't disclose 26-month appointments, mayor-election vacancies, or the planned $250K city manager threshold — and suggested capping contracting authority at 50%.
City Council — June 16, 2026 · 7:58:30 →Former Charter Review Commission chair endorsed the staff recommendation, including dropping the compensation measure.
City Council — May 19, 2026 · 2:53:31 →Raised concerns about the vacancy and compensation measures, predicting strong opposition if pay raises appear on the ballot.
City Council — May 19, 2026 · 2:56:41 →Supported Alternative 1 but flagged vacancy and settlement measures as at risk and suggested charter language fixes.
City Council — May 19, 2026 · 2:45:39 →Urged putting the council compensation amendment on the ballot anyway, arguing voters should decide.
City Council — May 19, 2026 · 2:49:02 →Opposed the proposed pay increases, saying they nearly double council pay and could attract career politicians from afar; also criticized the vacancy recommendation.
City Council — February 3, 2026 · 56:10 →Supported the public works contracting change, backed a lower settlement authority figure, and argued council pay should reflect a part-time role, suggesting 17-25% increases instead.
City Council — February 3, 2026 · 1:00:01 →Spoke in support of all the charter amendments, especially the pay increase, arguing service shouldn't be an act of charity.
City Council — February 3, 2026 · 1:03:30 →